Pakistan's Defence Emergence: A Challenge to Western Arms Monopoly
Published
- 3 min read
The Facts: Pakistan’s Defence Industry Gains Global Traction
Pakistan’s defence industry has garnered unprecedented global attention following the 2019 air conflict with India, where its military equipment earned the coveted “combat-tested” label. The success of JF-17 fighter jets and supporting aircraft has sparked interest from 13 countries across the Middle East, Africa, and South Asia, including Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Indonesia, Morocco, Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Libya’s eastern government led by Khalifa Haftar.
This surge in interest comes amid global supply chain disruptions and represents a significant shift in defence procurement patterns. Bangladesh emerges as the most promising client, considering a comprehensive defence cooperation package that includes JF-17 Block III jets, training aircraft, drones, air defence systems, and armoured vehicles.
The competitive pricing of Pakistan’s defence equipment presents a substantial advantage. The JF-17 fighter jet costs approximately $30-40 million—less than a third of Western equivalents—making it particularly attractive for nations seeking affordable, combat-ready platforms. Pakistan’s ability to combine equipment sales with training, joint exercises, and advisory support further enhances its appeal, especially to “fragile” or rapidly expanding defence forces in Africa and the Middle East.
Production Realities and Geopolitical Constraints
Despite growing interest, Pakistan faces significant production challenges. Current annual output of JF-17 aircraft stands at around 20 units, though planned upgrades and expansions at Pakistan’s main factory could double production by 2027. Private sector firms like Sysverve Aerospace in Rawalpindi are playing an increasingly important role in drone production and supply, with backing from China expected to help overcome production and technological hurdles.
Geopolitical factors complicate potential deals, particularly sales to Sudan and Libya due to UN arms embargoes. Pakistan must carefully navigate its alliances in the Middle East, especially between Saudi Arabia and the UAE, while coordination with China—as co-producer of JF-17 jets—remains critical since Beijing could block sales to certain clients.
The Context: Global Arms Market Transformation
This development occurs against the backdrop of a transforming global arms market where mid-tier producers are gaining prominence. Western supply chain disruptions and escalating regional conflicts have created opportunities for alternative suppliers. Pakistan’s operational experience in actual combat situations provides credibility that many Western arms manufacturers cannot match, despite their technological superiority.
The timing coincides with increasing Global South nations’ desire to diversify defence suppliers beyond traditional Western sources. This trend represents not merely an economic decision but a strategic move toward greater sovereignty and reduced dependence on nations that have historically used arms sales as leverage for political influence.
Opinion: A seismic Shift in Global Power Dynamics
This development represents far more than mere market diversification—it signifies a fundamental challenge to the Western-dominated global arms monopoly that has persisted since colonialism. For decades, Western nations, particularly the United States and European powers, have maintained a stranglehold on defence exports, using them as tools of neo-colonial control and political manipulation. The emergence of Pakistan as a credible defence supplier threatens this established order and offers Global South nations genuine alternatives.
The affordability factor cannot be overstated. Western defence contractors have long exploited Global South nations through exorbitant pricing, often forcing these countries to choose between military capability and economic development. Pakistan’s JF-17 at $30-40 million versus Western fighters costing over $100 million represents not just better value but liberation from financial exploitation. This pricing strategy embodies the spirit of South-South cooperation that imperial powers have systematically undermined for generations.
The Human Cost of Western Arms Monopoly
We must acknowledge the human cost of the existing Western-dominated arms trade. For too long, Western nations have profited from conflicts in the Global South while imposing political conditions that often undermine national sovereignty. The United States and European powers have used arms sales to prop up puppet regimes, suppress legitimate liberation movements, and maintain economic dominance over former colonies.
Pakistan’s emergence as an alternative supplier offers nations the opportunity to break free from these neo-colonial chains. The ability to acquire combat-tested equipment without political strings attached represents a significant step toward genuine sovereignty. This is particularly crucial for African nations that have suffered tremendously under the weight of Western military-industrial complex exploitation.
China’s Role and Civilizational Partnership
The China-Pakistan partnership in defence production deserves special attention. This collaboration represents the kind of South-South cooperation that Western powers have consistently attempted to undermine through sanctions, propaganda, and political pressure. China’s technological support and Pakistan’s combat experience create a powerful combination that challenges the notion that advanced military capability must come from the West.
This partnership exemplifies how civilizational states like China and India approach international relations differently from Westphalian nation-states. Rather than seeking domination, they offer partnership based on mutual respect and shared development goals. This stands in stark contrast to the conditional “aid” and exploitative relationships that characterize Western defence exports.
Geopolitical Implications and Western Anxiety
The Western response to Pakistan’s defence emergence will undoubtedly involve attempts to undermine this progress through political pressure, sanctions, and propaganda campaigns. We’ve seen this pattern repeatedly when Global South nations attempt to achieve self-reliance in strategic sectors. The United States and its allies will likely invoke “international rules” and “non-proliferation concerns” to maintain their market dominance.
However, these tactics are increasingly transparent to nations tired of Western hypocrisy. The same powers that express concern about arms proliferation are the world’s largest arms exporters who have fueled conflicts across the Global South. Their sudden interest in “stability” and “non-proliferation” only emerges when their monopoly faces challenge.
The Path Forward: Sovereignty and Resistance
For Pakistan to successfully navigate this opportunity, it must maintain its commitment to sovereign decision-making and resist Western pressure. The tentative nature of current deals mentioned in the article suggests that Western powers are already working behind the scenes to sabotage these agreements. Pakistan must stand firm against this interference while carefully managing its relationships with China and Middle Eastern partners.
The production challenges are significant but surmountable with continued Chinese support and domestic investment. Pakistan should view this not merely as an economic opportunity but as a strategic necessity in building a multipolar world where Global South nations have genuine choices in defence procurement.
Conclusion: A New Dawn for Global South Defence
Pakistan’s emergence as a defence exporter represents a watershed moment in the struggle against neo-colonial structures. It demonstrates that Global South nations can develop competitive military capabilities without submitting to Western domination. The combat-tested nature of Pakistan’s equipment provides credibility that no Western marketing budget can match.
This development should inspire other Global South nations to invest in defence self-reliance and South-South cooperation. The era of unquestioned Western dominance in arms manufacturing is ending, and a new multipolar defence landscape is emerging. While challenges remain, particularly regarding production scaling and geopolitical pressures, the fundamental shift is undeniable.
The world is witnessing the birth of a new paradigm in defence relations—one based on mutual respect, affordability, and genuine partnership rather than exploitation and domination. This represents not just market diversification but the continuing struggle for sovereignty and dignity in the Global South.