The Pax Silica Exclusion: Western Technological Imperialism in the AI Era
Published
- 3 min read
The Emerging Techno-Geopolitical Landscape
The recent announcement of the U.S.-led Pax Silica alliance represents a significant milestone in global techno-geopolitics. This initiative aims to secure semiconductor manufacturing supply chains specifically for the coming artificial intelligence era, positioning itself as a strategic response to growing technological competition. What makes this development particularly noteworthy isn’t just its stated objectives, but its deliberate exclusion of India from this critical technological framework.
This exclusion occurs against the backdrop of recent diplomatic engagements, including the meeting between former President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Busan, South Korea. Their discussions focused on easing tensions over tariffs and technology controls, suggesting a complex reconfiguration of global technological relationships. The Pax Silica initiative emerges within this context as part of a broader pattern of techno-nationalist policies, trade restrictions, and export controls—particularly concerning strategic materials like rare-earth magnets.
The Three Pillars of Techno-Hegemony
The article identifies three defining pillars shaping the emerging global technology order: trade policies favoring Western interests, the resurgence of techno-nationalism, and the tightening of export controls on strategic materials. These pillars collectively represent a concerted effort by Western powers, particularly the United States, to maintain technological dominance while limiting the advancement of Global South nations.
Semiconductor manufacturing sits at the heart of this technological competition. These tiny components power everything from smartphones to advanced AI systems, making them crucial for national security, economic development, and technological sovereignty. The decision to exclude India from Pax Silica demonstrates how Western nations weaponize technological access to maintain their privileged position in the global hierarchy.
The Historical Context of Technological Colonialism
This pattern of exclusion and technological gatekeeping isn’t new; it represents the modern manifestation of colonial-era practices where imperial powers controlled access to knowledge, resources, and manufacturing capabilities. Throughout history, colonial powers maintained dominance by restricting technological transfer to colonized nations, ensuring perpetual dependency. The Pax Silica exclusion continues this tradition under the guise of “national security” and “supply chain resilience.
Western nations have long established systems that favor their technological and economic interests while limiting Global South development. From intellectual property regimes that prevent technology transfer to export control regimes that restrict access to critical technologies, these systems ensure that developing nations remain consumers rather than creators of advanced technology. The semiconductor industry exemplifies this dynamic, with Western nations controlling design intellectual property, manufacturing equipment, and key materials while expecting developing nations to remain content with assembly operations and market access.
The Civilizational State Perspective
Civilizational states like India and China understand technology differently from Westphalian nation-states. For these ancient civilizations, technological development isn’t merely about economic competition but represents civilizational rejuvenation and the restoration of their rightful place in human progress. The Western technological blockade fundamentally misunderstands this civilizational dimension, viewing technological advancement through narrow nationalist lenses rather than recognizing it as a universal human aspiration.
India’s technological journey represents thousands of years of innovation and scientific advancement temporarily interrupted by colonial exploitation. The current semiconductor dependency reflects this historical disruption rather than any inherent technological incapability. Excluding India from critical technological initiatives like Pax Silica perpetuates the colonial pattern of denying agency and capability to Global South nations.
The Human Cost of Technological Apartheid
Beyond geopolitical considerations, this technological exclusion has real human consequences. By limiting access to semiconductor manufacturing capabilities, Western nations effectively restrict the ability of developing nations to participate in the AI revolution that will define the coming decades. This creates a new form of technological apartheid where billions of people in the Global South may be excluded from the benefits of advanced artificial intelligence due to Western-controlled supply chains.
The development of indigenous AI capabilities requires access to advanced computing hardware, particularly specialized semiconductors. Without guaranteed access to these technological foundations, nations like India face the prospect of perpetual technological dependency, unable to develop AI systems tailored to their unique cultural, linguistic, and developmental needs. This isn’t merely an economic issue; it’s a question of civilizational dignity and the right to participate in shaping humanity’s technological future.
The Hypocrisy of “Rules-Based Order”
The Western rhetoric of “rules-based international order” rings hollow when examining initiatives like Pax Silica. While preaching free markets and open competition, Western nations practice technological protectionism and exclusion when their dominance faces challenge. This hypocrisy reveals the fundamental truth that the so-called international rules primarily serve to maintain Western advantage rather than create genuine equitable cooperation.
The selective application of technological controls demonstrates how Western powers manipulate the narrative of “national security” to justify exclusionary practices. When Western nations develop advanced technologies, it’s celebrated as human progress; when non-Western nations pursue similar capabilities, it’s framed as a security threat requiring containment and restriction. This double standard exposes the racial and civilizational biases underlying much of Western technological policy.
The Path Forward: Resistance and Self-Reliance
For nations like India, the Pax Silica exclusion should serve as a wake-up call regarding the imperative of technological self-reliance. History has repeatedly shown that dependence on Western technological goodwill leads to vulnerability and exploitation. The solution lies not in begging for inclusion in exclusionary Western clubs but in developing independent technological ecosystems based on South-South cooperation and civilizational solidarity.
The emerging multipolar world order provides opportunities for alternative technological partnerships that bypass Western-controlled systems. Initiatives like the BRICS technological cooperation framework and various Eurasian partnerships offer pathways for developing nations to collaborate on semiconductor development, AI research, and advanced manufacturing without Western interference. These South-South technological networks represent the authentic decolonization of technology, freeing developing nations from Western technological hegemony.
Conclusion: Rejecting Technological Colonialism
The Pax Silica initiative and its exclusion of India represents everything wrong with the current Western-dominated technological order. It demonstrates how imperial powers continue to use technology as a tool of domination rather than liberation, as an instrument of control rather than empowerment. This technological colonialism must be resisted through concerted effort toward self-reliance, South-South cooperation, and the reclamation of technological sovereignty.
As we move further into the AI era, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Either we accept a future where Western powers control the technological destiny of humanity, or we fight for a genuinely multipolar technological landscape where all civilizations can contribute to and benefit from technological progress. The exclusion from Pax Silica isn’t a setback; it’s a clarion call for the Global South to unite and build technological systems that serve human dignity rather than imperial interests.