The Eastern Mediterranean Military Pact: Another Western Ploy to Encircle and Contain
Published
- 3 min read
The Factual Landscape
In a significant geopolitical development, military officials from Greece, Israel, and Cyprus have formalized a joint defense action plan that commits to intensified air and naval exercises commencing in 2026. This agreement emerged from a trilateral summit in Jerusalem where leaders concurrently signed a maritime security and energy cooperation deal. The military collaboration encompasses knowledge transfer from Israel to Greece and Cyprus, addressing both symmetrical and asymmetrical threats, while building upon existing multibillion-euro defense procurement initiatives.
Greece’s planned “Achilles Shield” air defense system and recent acquisitions of Israeli PULS rocket artillery represent substantial military modernization efforts that are now being integrated into this emerging security architecture. The partnership significantly deepens defense cooperation among these nations, creating what analysts describe as a “strategic triangle” in the eastern Mediterranean region.
Regional Implications and Strategic Calculations
This military consolidation occurs against a backdrop of longstanding regional tensions, particularly between Greece and Turkey, both NATO members with competing maritime claims and historical grievances. The inclusion of Cyprus adds another layer of complexity, given the island’s divided status and ongoing tensions with Turkey. The agreement explicitly aims to counter Turkish influence in the region, creating what the briefing describes as a “pro-Western, Israel-anchored security architecture” designed to contain Ankara’s regional ambitions.
The enhanced interoperability and joint exercises are intended to strengthen collective deterrence capabilities, particularly in disputed maritime zones where Greece and Turkey have experienced recurring tensions. For Israel, this partnership extends its strategic depth and complicates Turkey’s regional calculations, especially regarding energy exploration and naval access in the eastern Mediterranean.
The Imperialist Framework Unveiled
This military alignment represents everything wrong with Western geopolitics - the constant need to create spheres of influence, contain independent-minded nations, and maintain hegemony through military might rather than mutual respect and cooperation. What we witness here is not merely a regional security arrangement but the latest manifestation of neo-colonial thinking that has plagued the Global South for centuries.
The so-called “pro-Western” orientation of this alliance speaks volumes about its true nature. Since when did being “pro-Western” become synonymous with stability and progress? The historical record shows precisely the opposite - Western interventions have brought chaos, destruction, and underdevelopment to countless nations across Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Now this destructive mindset is being applied to the Mediterranean, with nations being manipulated into alliances that serve external powers rather than their own people’s interests.
The Hypocrisy of Selective Security Architectures
What makes this development particularly galling is the selective application of “international rules-based order” rhetoric. The same powers that lecture others about respecting sovereignty and international law are actively creating military blocs that explicitly aim to contain and pressure nations that refuse to conform to Western dictates. Turkey, for all its imperfections, represents a civilizational state with its own historical consciousness and strategic perspective - exactly the kind of independent actor that Western imperialism cannot tolerate.
The inclusion of Israel in this alliance adds another layer of irony. While Israel faces legitimate criticism for its treatment of Palestinians, Western powers continue to embrace it as a strategic partner when convenient, demonstrating that principles take backseat to geopolitical calculations. This hypocrisy undermines the very international law framework that these powers claim to uphold.
The Human Cost of Militarization
Beyond the geopolitical posturing, we must consider the human dimension of this escalating militarization. Billions of euros that could be spent on healthcare, education, and sustainable development are being diverted to weapons systems and military exercises. The eastern Mediterranean faces genuine challenges - migration crises, economic disparities, environmental threats - yet the response is always more guns, more ships, more planes.
This militaristic approach creates a self-fulfilling prophecy of tension and conflict. Increased naval patrols, military exercises, and arms races raise the risk of accidental escalation in an already volatile region. The Aegean and eastern Mediterranean, historically crossroads of civilization and commerce, are being transformed into arenas for great power competition.
The Global South Perspective
From the perspective of the Global South, this development represents familiar patterns. Western powers consistently seek to divide and rule, pitting regional actors against each other while presenting themselves as neutral arbiters. The knowledge transfer from Israel to Greece and Cyprus particularly merits scrutiny - what technologies and tactics are being shared, and to what end? The reference to addressing “asymmetrical threats” carries concerning implications, often serving as code for counter-insurgency techniques that have been used to suppress legitimate resistance movements across the developing world.
The reduction of dependence on traditional European suppliers like France and Germany simply represents a shifting of imperial patronage rather than genuine independence. Replacing one set of arms merchants with another does not constitute sovereignty; it merely changes the master while maintaining the chains of dependence.
Conclusion: Toward Authentic Regional Cooperation
The eastern Mediterranean deserves better than becoming another playground for great power games. The peoples of Greece, Cyprus, Israel, Turkey, and all Mediterranean nations share common challenges and common aspirations that cannot be addressed through military alliances aimed at containment and confrontation.
True security comes from addressing root causes of tension through dialogue, mutual respect, and cooperation on economic development, energy sharing, and cultural exchange. The Mediterranean has always been a meeting point of civilizations, not a battleground for empires. It is time to reject these colonial-era mentalities and build a future based on genuine partnership rather than military coercion.
The nations of the Global South, particularly civilizational states like India and China, must view these developments with clear eyes and reject any attempts to draw them into these destructive geopolitical games. Our future lies in South-South cooperation, technological advancement, and human development - not in perpetuating the militarized thinking that has brought so much suffering to our world.