The Abdication of American Leadership: How the Destruction of USAID Endangers Global Health and National Security
Published
- 3 min read
The Unfolding Catastrophe of 2025
The year 2025 will be remembered as a turning point in American global leadership, but for all the wrong reasons. While much attention has focused on Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s damaging policies, the most catastrophic public health decision emerged from an unexpected quarter: Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s elimination of the U.S. Agency for International Development. This move didn’t just dismantle an agency; it systematically destroyed decades of global health infrastructure that protected both Americans and vulnerable populations worldwide.
USAID stood as one of the most consequential public health institutions globally, arguably surpassing even the World Health Organization in its practical impact. For decades, it served as the backbone of global disease prevention, funding infectious disease surveillance, HIV treatment programs, tuberculosis and malaria prevention, maternal and child health services, clean water systems, sanitation infrastructure, nutrition programs, vaccine delivery systems, and health workforce training across developing nations. This wasn’t mere foreign aid—it was frontline defense against global health threats that respect no borders.
The Architecture of Prevention Collapses
The elimination of USAID represents more than just budget cuts or bureaucratic reorganization. It constitutes the deliberate dismantling of a sophisticated global early warning system that detected outbreaks before they became pandemics. The agency’s work stabilized regions where collapsing health systems fuel hunger, conflict, and mass migration. It improved women’s health outcomes, helped families plan their futures, and lifted entire populations from poverty through health-focused development.
The consequences are already unfolding with terrifying speed. Disease surveillance systems are collapsing across vulnerable regions, meaning outbreaks will be detected later or not at all. Interruptions in HIV and tuberculosis treatment are fueling drug-resistant strains that will inevitably reach American shores. Gaps in maternal and child health services are translating into preventable deaths that would have been unthinkable just months ago. The weakening of vaccine infrastructure invites the return of diseases that were previously in decline.
The Strategic Blow to American Soft Power
Beyond the immediate public health consequences, the destruction of USAID represents a catastrophic miscalculation in American foreign policy strategy. In international affairs, nations project power through two primary means: hard power (military strength, sanctions, coercion) and soft power (trust, humanitarian aid, scientific cooperation, reliable partnership). USAID served as the cornerstone of American soft power for generations.
When the United States helped countries prevent disease, strengthen health systems, and keep children alive, we built credibility and earned cooperation. This made American leadership legitimate rather than coercive. The elimination of USAID broadcasts a dangerous message to the world: that America has become transactional, unreliable, and disinterested in shared global responsibility. This erosion of trust will make cooperation during future emergencies exponentially more difficult, not just for this administration but for future ones that may seek to restore America’s role as a force for good.
The Ideological Wrecking Crew
The responsibility for this decision rests squarely with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who presided over, defended, and even celebrated the dismantling of USAID. President Trump supported this catastrophic move, while Elon Musk provided the ideological and operational framework that made it possible. Together, they reframed global public health as expendable “foreign aid” rather than recognizing it for what it truly is: essential infrastructure for global stability and American national security.
This represents a fundamental failure of strategic thinking. These leaders have confused austerity with strength and mistaken retreat for sovereignty. They’ve failed to understand that diseases don’t respect borders and that instability anywhere ultimately threatens security everywhere. The few dollars “saved” through this shortsighted decision will be paid back a thousandfold in future health crises, security challenges, and diplomatic failures.
The Moral and Strategic Imperative
As someone who deeply believes in American leadership and values, I find this decision morally reprehensible and strategically disastrous. The United States has abandoned its role as a global health leader at precisely the moment when leadership is most needed. We’ve turned our back on vulnerable populations, on mothers and children, on communities struggling against preventable diseases.
The destruction of USAID represents more than just bad policy—it represents a betrayal of American values. Since World War II, America has led the world not just through military might but through moral authority and humanitarian leadership. We’ve been the nation that feeds the hungry, heals the sick, and helps lift nations from poverty. This decision signals that we’ve abandoned that legacy for a narrow, isolationist vision that serves neither American interests nor human dignity.
The Inevitable Reckoning
History will judge this decision harshly, and rightly so. While Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s damage to domestic public health is significant, the elimination of USAID represents something even more profound: an abdication of global responsibility that trades decades of disease prevention and diplomatic influence for short-term political points. Future generations will look back on 2025 as the year America abandoned its role as a global health leader.
The tragic irony is that this decision ultimately makes Americans less safe. We’ve dismantled the very systems that would protect us from the next pandemic. We’ve weakened the global health infrastructure that prevents outbreaks from reaching our shores. We’ve destroyed relationships that would ensure international cooperation during future crises.
A Call to Restore American Leadership
This moment demands more than just criticism—it demands a recommitment to American values and global leadership. We must recognize that global health security is national security. That preventing disease abroad protects Americans at home. That helping vulnerable populations isn’t charity—it’s strategic investment in a more stable, secure world.
The restoration of USAID or its functional equivalent must become a priority for anyone who values American leadership, global stability, and basic human dignity. We need to rebuild what has been destroyed, reinvest in global health infrastructure, and recommit to the diplomatic relationships that make cooperation possible.
America stands at a crossroads. We can continue down this path of isolationism and short-term thinking, or we can reclaim our role as a global leader committed to health, stability, and human dignity. The choice isn’t just about budgets or bureaucracy—it’s about who we are as a nation and what values we choose to represent on the world stage. The destruction of USAID represents a failure of vision, but it’s not too late to choose a better path—one that honors America’s best traditions and serves both our national interests and our humanitarian values.