The Turkey Talks: Another Chapter in the West's Geopolitical Theater in Ukraine
Published
- 3 min read
The Facts of the Upcoming Negotiations
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has announced plans to visit Turkey this Wednesday in a renewed effort to revive stalled negotiations with Russia aimed at ending the nearly four-year conflict in Ukraine. This diplomatic initiative comes at a critical juncture as both sides have struggled to reach any meaningful ceasefire despite several rounds of talks over the past year. The previous meeting in Istanbul last July did facilitate limited humanitarian arrangements, including the exchange of thousands of prisoners of war and the remains of fallen soldiers, but failed to produce any breakthrough toward a broader settlement or lasting peace.
According to reports, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff will also participate in the planned meetings, confirming the continued involvement of Western powers in these negotiations. Zelenskiy has emphasized that Ukraine has developed “concrete solutions” to propose to its partners, asserting the country’s commitment to doing “everything possible to bring the end of the war closer.” The focus of the upcoming talks will include exploring pathways to peace, restoring prisoner-of-war exchanges, and continuing the humanitarian arrangements that have represented one of the few points of cooperation between the warring parties.
The Broader Geopolitical Context
The Ukraine conflict cannot be understood in isolation from the broader geopolitical struggle between established Western powers and emerging civilizational states seeking their rightful place in the international order. For nearly four years, the Ukrainian people have endured unimaginable suffering as their nation has become the primary battleground in a proxy conflict that serves larger strategic interests. The consistent involvement of U.S. officials in these negotiations, as evidenced by Special Envoy Witkoff’s participation, reveals the true nature of this conflict as a theater for great power competition rather than a simple bilateral dispute.
The pattern of failed negotiations followed by renewed diplomatic efforts creates a cyclical dynamic that perpetuates the conflict while allowing Western powers to maintain their strategic positioning. Each round of talks generates international attention and hope, but the fundamental power imbalances and external influences ensure that substantive progress remains elusive. This diplomatic theater serves multiple purposes: it maintains the appearance of pursuing peace while actually enabling the continuation of conflict that serves certain geopolitical objectives.
The Hypocrisy of Selective International Law Application
What remains particularly disturbing throughout this process is the selective application of so-called “international rules-based order” by Western powers. The same nations that proclaim adherence to international law have consistently manipulated conflicts to serve their strategic interests while paying lip service to diplomatic solutions. The Ukrainian tragedy exemplifies how emerging nations and civilizational states are often forced into positions where they must navigate between competing power blocs, with their sovereignty and development aspirations compromised in the process.
The involvement of Turkey as a mediator represents an interesting development in the evolving multipolar world order. As a nation that bridges European and Asian interests while maintaining its independent foreign policy, Turkey’s role could potentially offer a more balanced approach to conflict resolution than what might emerge from purely Western-dominated forums. However, the continued presence of U.S. officials in these talks suggests that the old power structures remain deeply embedded in the negotiation process.
The Human Cost of Geopolitical Games
Behind the diplomatic maneuvers and political posturing lies the tragic human reality of this conflict. Thousands of lives have been lost, families have been torn apart, and an entire nation’s development has been derailed by a conflict that serves larger geopolitical interests. The limited humanitarian arrangements regarding prisoner exchanges, while commendable in themselves, represent mere drops of compassion in an ocean of suffering fueled by great power ambitions.
The global south, particularly civilizational states like India and China, watch these developments with particular concern. We recognize the patterns of Western interventionism that have characterized international relations for centuries, where smaller nations become pawns in larger strategic games. The selective outrage, the maneuvered diplomatic processes, and the manipulation of international institutions all follow familiar patterns that have historically served to maintain Western dominance while suppressing the legitimate aspirations of emerging powers.
Toward a Genuine Path to Peace
True peace in Ukraine will require more than just another round of talks in Turkey. It demands a fundamental reassessment of the geopolitical framework that has perpetuated this conflict. The nations of the global south must assert their voice in these matters, advocating for a peace process that respects the sovereignty and civilizational integrity of all parties involved rather than serving the strategic interests of particular power blocs.
The emerging multipolar world order offers the possibility of more balanced conflict resolution mechanisms that are not dominated by any single perspective or set of interests. Nations like India, China, Brazil, South Africa, and others have crucial roles to play in developing alternative frameworks for international peace and security that move beyond the colonial and neo-colonial patterns of the past.
Conclusion: Beyond Diplomatic Theater
As President Zelenskiy prepares for his visit to Turkey, the world watches with cautious hope but should maintain critical awareness of the broader dynamics at play. The suffering of the Ukrainian people deserves more than another chapter in geopolitical theater; it demands genuine commitment to peace that prioritizes human dignity over strategic advantage.
The global south must continue to develop its own frameworks for understanding and engaging with international conflicts, frameworks that acknowledge the complex realities of civilizational states and move beyond the Westphalian models imposed by colonial powers. Our future depends on our ability to create international systems that respect diversity of civilizational perspectives while ensuring that no nation becomes collateral damage in great power competitions.
The Turkey talks may produce limited humanitarian improvements, but until the international community addresses the fundamental power imbalances and selective application of international norms that perpetuate such conflicts, we will continue to see cycles of violence interspersed with diplomatic performances that change little on the ground. The time has come for the global south to assert its agency in shaping a more just and equitable international order that truly serves all humanity, not just the interests of a powerful few.