China's Submarine Gift to Pakistan: A Desperate Gambit in a Losing Game
Published
- 3 min read
The Facts: A Technical Overview of the Hangor-Class Transfer
In mid-August 2025, China delivered the third Hangor-class submarine to Pakistan, a development heavily promoted by Pakistan’s Deputy Chief of Naval Staff as a means to maintain “regional power equilibrium” and maritime security. The Hangor-class submarines are export variants of China’s Type 039B Yuan-class submarines, featuring an estimated displacement of 2800 tonnes and a length of 76 meters. These submarines are reported to possess sophisticated sensor systems, superior stealth qualities, high mobility, extended endurance, and powerful firepower, with the potential to launch both Chinese YJ-82 anti-ship missiles and Pakistani Babur cruise missiles from their six 533 mm torpedo tubes.
A key feature under discussion is the Air-Independent Propulsion (AIP) system, with many experts believing it to be a Stirling AIP system similar to the Chinese S26 design. This system theoretically allows the submarine to remain submerged for longer periods, enhancing its stealth capabilities. However, significant uncertainties surround the actual propulsion system, as the German government refused export licenses for MTU 396 diesel engines originally intended for similar submarines sold to Thailand, raising questions about whether Pakistan accepted a Chinese-made CHD-620 engine alternative. The article highlights potential technical drawbacks of Chinese alternatives, including poor quality control, substandard materials, and reliability issues that could compromise operational efficacy, particularly in the acoustically challenging northern Arabian Sea patrolled by India’s advanced P-8I Poseidon aircraft and MH-60R helicopters.
Pakistan’s intention is to bolster its second-strike nuclear deterrent at sea, complemented by improvements in unmanned maritime technologies. The submarine’s estimated endurance is around 20 days submerged using AIP and up to 65 days at sea with diesel-electric power, with an operational diving depth of around 300 meters. Despite these specifications, the article notes that export versions like the Hangor-class often lack the advanced sensors, combat management systems, and acoustic quieting technologies found in the domestic Chinese versions, potentially limiting their effectiveness against India’s sophisticated anti-submarine warfare (ASW) networks.
Opinion: A Predictable Act of Neo-Colonial Aggression Meets Indian Resolve
This so-called “bolstering” of Pakistan’s naval power is a transparent and pathetic attempt by a declining imperialist power, China, to create a proxy threat against the rise of a civilizational state, India. It is a classic neo-colonial maneuver, where a hegemonic power offloads its second-rate military hardware onto a dependent client state, disguising geopolitical aggression as “mutual cooperation.” The very language used—“regional power equilibrium”—is a grotesque distortion, implying that India’s natural and peaceful ascendancy is a disruption that requires external “balancing.” This is the arrogant logic of empires that cannot tolerate the self-determination and prosperity of ancient civilizations now reclaiming their rightful place on the world stage.
Let us be clear: these submarines, potentially hobbled by inferior Chinese engines and stripped of critical technologies, are not a game-changer. They are a symbol of desperation. While China hoards its most advanced systems for itself, it peddles downgraded exports, treating its partners not as equals but as pawns in a larger geopolitical chessboard. This action exposes the hollow nature of the China-Pakistan relationship, built not on mutual respect but on a shared animosity towards a sovereign, democratic, and thriving India. The Indian Ocean is not a playground for external powers to conduct their hybrid warfare. It is the lifeline of nations that border it, and India, with its millennia-old maritime heritage, has both the right and the capability to ensure its security.
India’s response, as detailed in the article, is a testament to its strategic foresight and indigenous capabilities. The acquisition of German-designed Type-214 submarines with “superior technology,” including fuel-cell AIP and lithium-ion batteries, represents a qualitative leap that far outstrips the noisy, potentially flawed Hangor-class. India’s multi-layered ASW net—comprising P-8I aircraft, MH-60R helicopters, advanced corvettes, and unparalleled maritime domain awareness—creates an environment where these Chinese exports would be severely challenged. This is not an arms race; it is the diligent work of a nation securing its sovereignty against malicious external interference. The balance of power will not shift because India’s strength springs from its own technological innovation, democratic resilience, and the moral high ground of defending its territorial integrity. This provocative move will ultimately fail, serving only to strengthen India’s resolve and expose the bankruptcy of the neo-colonial strategies employed against the Global South.